In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied a DHS appeal and upheld a grant of adjustment of status. The Board found the respondent was not inadmissible under INA 212(a)(2)(C) because of the small amount of marijuana at issue and the lack of evidence of any remuneration or commercial aspect to the transaction; not admissible under 212(a)(6)(C) because the fraudulent submission of a letter purportedly written by her father was not a “material” misrepresentation; and warranted a favorable exercise of discretion. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.